King Leir

Hey There! Be Here… Let me tell you about Leir… The King that it…

 

Leir is a legendary ancient kind of the Britons. He went on a mission with his father to the kingdom of Britain. There he had the longest reign, 60 years, of all the prior kings. According to Geoffrey, Leir’s father lived at the same time as Elijah, a Biblical prophet. Leir divides his kingdom among three daughters. Their dowry depended upon how much they loved him or claimed to love him

 

His power base was in the city of Kaerleir along the banks of the River Soar.

King Leir

King Leir

According to Geoffrey

So let’s talk about the Bible!

Hey There! Be Here.

Throughout my research I am finding that the reason of the bible translation was for mass understanding. As Christianity spread, language became diverse.  In 405 the typical bible used was Jerome’s Vulgate, which was in Latin. Citizen who didn’t know Latin depended upon priest, minister, and others who could read Latin to inform them about the bible. However, as time progressed, it became obvious that more people could be converted if they could read the Bible themselves. And Christians need more followers, right???

So…

Circa 1100, John Wycliffe, John Purvey, and Nicholas of Hereford created the first translation English bible, translated from Latin. With two different editions, the first edition was a literal, word for word translation from Latin to English. However, translations can never be exact and still make sense and contain the meaning intended. So, in 1396, another edition was created that did not focus on the exact translation, but rather focused on the meaning and connotations the Bible provided. This edition was much more disseminated. Seems as though Wycliffe’s followers had good intentions: Show what God meant instead of what he actually says because what he says isn’t going to make sense with a literal translations. No harm, right? Well in the time, this was a heresy, so Wycliffe’s followers, or disciples, were persecuted. You would think Christians would know better. Isn’t this what happen to Christ???   

 

Links: http://www.allabouttruth.org/history-of-bible-translation-faq.htm

 

 

battle of maldon read in old english

In General

The original The Battle of Maldon was lost in  fire  (the same that destroyed Beowulf), but fortunately a copy had been made of it.  The beginning and the end were already missing before it was copied, but it is believed that no important part has been lost.

On August 10th, 991 on the southern bank of the River Blackwater, below Maldon, Essex, the Anglo-Saxon leader Byrhtnothfought and lost a battle against Anlaf and the Vikings.  The Danes had sailed up the estuary of the River Blackwater and were on Northey Island, which is linked to the mainland by a causeway. This causeway – no more than eight feet wide at most – is only accessible at low tide.  Then the Vikings tried to come across the narrow causeway, which could be defended by only a few men.  Realising that their attempt was going to fail, the Vikings asked Byrhtnoth to allow them safe passage so that the armies might fight fairly.  It is at this point that Byrhtnoth is often criticised about his “ofermod”, as he allows them to cross  soon after the battle started, Byrhtnoth was killed and  some men fled and a lot of the Anglo-Saxon warriors, believing their leader had fled, lost hope and morale and the battle would soon end in the slaughter.

 

Cunedda… as we see him.

Who is Cunedda?A hero? A chieftain? A king, ruler? A mystery? All of these seem to make up this Welshish legend, especially being a conflicting mystery being constructed with several different theories to make up his life… or lack thereof.  Legend has this hero of war originally from Southeast Scotland; however, due to his profound military knowledge, which aided in the Irish invasion, Vortigern –somewhat of a “British High King” rewarded him with land in North Wales. He called this land “Gwledig y Cunedda”, or “Cunedda’s land”. Some experts will say it can be translated into “desirable land”. But that obsessive description may place Cunedda too far on the pedestal.
Cunedda was a 5th century leader of the Votadini tribe of southern Scotland. The name Cunedda derives from the Brythonic word kunodagos, meaning good hound. A date for Cunedda’s actual life span has yet to become exact however Cunedda died in 460 AD and he was 74 years old at his time of death.  Speculation has placed his arrival to North Wales anywhere from 383 to 440 A.D.
 
“Cunedda Who Hounded the Irish.” Create a Blog Site – FREE Blogs – Thoughts.com. Zappbrannigan420, 09 Sept. 2010. Web. 09 Sept. 2011. <http://www.thoughts.com/&gt;.

The Dream of the Rood vs. Beowulf…

Compare the depiction of Christ’s death in The Dream of the Rood to the description of the death of Beowulf. 

Do these characters meet their death in similar ways?  Or are they different? 

The death came similarly because they were fighting for similar things. Both were fighting for protection of others. Beowulf fought the dragon that harmed others. Christ fought a different dragon called sin. Both the dragon and sin are dangerous to mankind and each “hero” had to die in order for the wickedness to die.

 

Are there any ways in which the specific description of the dying Beowulf seems “Christlike” (in terms of the way that Christ is described in the poem, not in more general terms like “sacrifice”)? 

Other than dying to protect others. Beowulf’s death had characteristic of Christ’s death in the way it was received by others. People that were on Beowulf’s side in defeating the dragon were terrified and were too weak and cowardly to help him. If they helped, perhaps Beowulf’s death would have been save. The same happen to Christ. His disciples abandon him in the time of need.

After the crucifixion of Christ, his admirers were once afraid and belittled him came to mourn uselessly over his body. The same happen to Beowulf. Those would were to cowardly to help mourned over his body.

 

Are there any ways in which Christ seems “Beowulf-like”?  Note that there are no explicit references to Christ or to his sacrifice in the Beowulf poem—only to God and his almighty power to determine fate.  Is this an oversight? 

Beowulf was depicted as having more human qualities than Christ. Or shall I say he had more warrior-like qualities. In the poem, Beowulf was said to “glitter and glide” or show himself off, which is typical of that of a warrior. However, Christ is thought of and depicted as being more humble.

 

Is Christ’s redeeming presence simply something we are meant to take for granted?  Or is one poem more pagan than the other? 

Both the poem of a Christ-like plight do not consider sacrificial death as something to be taken for granted. However, it is portrayed as something that is often overlooked. Each poem depicts Beowulf’s and Christ’s death as a heroic effort; however, the selfishness of others quickly dismiss their death.

 

Beowulf

lines 2845-2852

Before long

The battle-dodgers abandoned the wood,

The ones who had let down their lord earlier,

The tail-turners, ten of them together.

When he needed them most, they had made odd.

Now they were ashamed and came behind shields

In their battle-outfits, to where the old man lay

Lines 2892-2897

Then he ordered the outcome of the fight to be reported

To those camped on the ridge, that crowd of retainers

Who had sat all morning, sad at heart,

Shield bearers wondering about

The man they loved: would this day be his last

Or would he return?…

A Dream of A Rood

Lines 60-68

They took their Almighty God,

Lifted him from that grim torment. Those warriors abandoned me

Standing all blood-drenched, al wounded with arrows.

They laid the limb-weary one, stood at his body’s head;

Beheld they there heaven’s Lord, and he himself rested there.

Worn from that great strife. Then they worked him an earth-house

Men in the slayers sight carved it from bright stone

Set in it the Wielder of Victories. Then they sang him a sorrow-song

Sad in the eventide, when they would go again.

 

 

Remember that even with Tolkien’s early 8th-century date for the poem, all the known Anglo-Saxon kings would have been Christian by this time, many for as long as 100 years.

 

Hey There! Be Here

Hello, World!

It’s Be.

So check us out… As I tell you what Early British Lit is about!

Hello world!

What’s exciting today?!